![]() ![]() If a paper was previously reviewed at another Nature journal, the authors can use an automated manuscript transfer service to transfer the referees' reports to Nature Communications via a link sent by the editor who handled the manuscript. Preprint archives do not compromise novelty. Papers that are published independently while your manuscript is under review or under revision at Nature Communications are also not considered to compromise novelty, even in cases where there is conceptual overlap. The novelty of a submitted paper is considered to be compromised if it has significant conceptual overlap with a published paper or one accepted for publication by Nature Communications. Manuscripts that meet these editorial criteria are sent out to external referees for further assessment. Copies of any papers containing related work that are under consideration or in-press at other journals should be included with the submission as additional supplementary information.Įach new submission is assigned to a primary editor, who reads the paper, consults with the other editors, and then evaluates the novelty and potential impact of the work, the appropriateness for the journal's editorial scope, the conceptual or methodological advances described in the paper, and its potential interest to Nature Communications' readership. The corresponding author should indicate whether the work described in the manuscript has been discussed with a specific Nature Communications editor before submission. ![]() Publishing is a real marathon, and I’m very thankful for biorxiv so we could rapidly communicate our results while the paper was under review.Manuscripts should be submitted via the online submission system. 2 weeks later, proofs sent to us for editing. We took 1 week to shorten the article length and reformat, then resubmitted again. After 1 month we got reviews back, paper “accepted in principle” - a term nature journals always use when they’re going to accept as long as you format properly. Manuscript was sent back to reviewers immediately. We took about 3 months to get the manuscript revised, then resubmitted. Our reviews were fairly positive, but still required some experiments. After reviews cane back, Manuscript Under Consideration again for 7 days. Don't go looking for stories to either get your hopes up or validate your fears.Ĭongrats on getting sent to review! We just went through this with a nature journal, here’s our timeline: 1. It has literally zero connection to what happens to your article. It just means there's other stuff going on.Įdit: Also, keep in mind that anyone who has a story of a long wait and then getting accepted didn't have their manuscript accepted BECAUSE of the long wait. "Under consideration" means that they're getting around to it and that's not good or bad. Now imagine that it's an editor of a major journal in finals/holiday season that is simultaneously trying to catch up on grading before the deadline and trying to get ready for their vacation. Now imagine that it's an editor of a major journal who has many articles to work through. ![]() You know how most professors are fairly famous for responding extremely late or just never responding to emails ever? Now imagine that the professor is also an editor who has to do extra work on top of everything else. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |